diff mbox series

drm/drm_gem.c: Remove surplus else after return

Message ID 20230622101857.2298773-1-suijingfeng@loongson.cn
State New
Headers
Series drm/drm_gem.c: Remove surplus else after return |

Commit Message

Sui Jingfeng June 22, 2023, 10:18 a.m. UTC 
  else is not generally useful after return

Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Thomas Zimmermann June 26, 2023, 8:07 a.m. UTC | #1 
Am 22.06.23 um 12:18 schrieb Sui Jingfeng:
> else is not generally useful after return
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 1a5a2cd0d4ec..c18686f434d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1150,8 +1150,8 @@ int drm_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>   {
>   	if (obj->funcs->pin)
>   		return obj->funcs->pin(obj);
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   void drm_gem_unpin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Sui Jingfeng July 4, 2023, 6:14 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi,  Thomas


On 2023/6/22 18:18, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> else is not generally useful after return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 1a5a2cd0d4ec..c18686f434d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1150,8 +1150,8 @@ int drm_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>   {
>   	if (obj->funcs->pin)
>   		return obj->funcs->pin(obj);
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   void drm_gem_unpin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)


I have merge this patch with the dim tool, by using the following command,


  ./dim push-branch drm-misc-next


Is this looks fine?

I'm so worry about the dim tool now.

I want to make sure if I do the things correctly.
Sui Jingfeng July 4, 2023, 6:16 p.m. UTC | #3 
Hi,

On 2023/7/5 02:14, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>
> I have merge this patch with the dim tool, by using the following 
> command, 


I have merged(pushed) this patch just now to drm-misc-next branch.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
index 1a5a2cd0d4ec..c18686f434d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
@@ -1150,8 +1150,8 @@  int drm_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
 {
 	if (obj->funcs->pin)
 		return obj->funcs->pin(obj);
-	else
-		return 0;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void drm_gem_unpin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)