[next] scsi: smartpqi: Replace one-element arrays with flexible-array members
Commit Message
One-element arrays are deprecated, and we are replacing them with flexible
array members instead. So, replace one-element arrays with flexible-array
members in a couple of structures, and refactor the rest of the code,
accordingly.
This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
routines on memcpy().
This results in no differences in binary output.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/204
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h | 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 02:27:20PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> One-element arrays are deprecated, and we are replacing them with flexible
> array members instead. So, replace one-element arrays with flexible-array
> members in a couple of structures, and refactor the rest of the code,
> accordingly.
>
> This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> routines on memcpy().
>
> This results in no differences in binary output.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/204
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Gustavo,
> One-element arrays are deprecated, and we are replacing them with
> flexible array members instead. So, replace one-element arrays with
> flexible-array members in a couple of structures, and refactor the
> rest of the code, accordingly.
Applied to 6.5/scsi-staging, thanks!
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:27:20 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> One-element arrays are deprecated, and we are replacing them with flexible
> array members instead. So, replace one-element arrays with flexible-array
> members in a couple of structures, and refactor the rest of the code,
> accordingly.
>
> This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> routines on memcpy().
>
> [...]
Applied to 6.5/scsi-queue, thanks!
[1/1] scsi: smartpqi: Replace one-element arrays with flexible-array members
https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/6f0a92fd7db1
@@ -982,12 +982,12 @@ struct report_phys_lun_16byte_wwid {
struct report_phys_lun_8byte_wwid_list {
struct report_lun_header header;
- struct report_phys_lun_8byte_wwid lun_entries[1];
+ struct report_phys_lun_8byte_wwid lun_entries[];
};
struct report_phys_lun_16byte_wwid_list {
struct report_lun_header header;
- struct report_phys_lun_16byte_wwid lun_entries[1];
+ struct report_phys_lun_16byte_wwid lun_entries[];
};
struct raid_map_disk_data {
@@ -1203,7 +1203,6 @@ static inline int pqi_report_phys_luns(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info, void **b
unsigned int i;
u8 rpl_response_format;
u32 num_physicals;
- size_t rpl_16byte_wwid_list_length;
void *rpl_list;
struct report_lun_header *rpl_header;
struct report_phys_lun_8byte_wwid_list *rpl_8byte_wwid_list;
@@ -1232,9 +1231,9 @@ static inline int pqi_report_phys_luns(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info, void **b
rpl_8byte_wwid_list = rpl_list;
num_physicals = get_unaligned_be32(&rpl_8byte_wwid_list->header.list_length) / sizeof(rpl_8byte_wwid_list->lun_entries[0]);
- rpl_16byte_wwid_list_length = sizeof(struct report_lun_header) + (num_physicals * sizeof(struct report_phys_lun_16byte_wwid));
- rpl_16byte_wwid_list = kmalloc(rpl_16byte_wwid_list_length, GFP_KERNEL);
+ rpl_16byte_wwid_list = kmalloc(struct_size(rpl_16byte_wwid_list, lun_entries,
+ num_physicals), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rpl_16byte_wwid_list)
return -ENOMEM;