Message ID | 20221104022723.1066429-1-luwei32@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a5d:6687:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id l7csp101601wru; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:31:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5UN3xXQtt2SHpOhG4+FITmfXgiIKynHirEz85o6Hmr7C9SVhyzfvFV2/O63XgfvMo2CnsT X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:94d1:b0:790:65a:3a18 with SMTP id dn17-20020a17090794d100b00790065a3a18mr31204484ejc.428.1667525469567; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 18:31:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667525469; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WoLUJgTUT7fphVMxp5/AUkSxD0BkxmmBJwKKGZcfsjqhZy51Idr9x+B3scdUT6Pr9P O2U7oXn1EpAa3NGDq4VLnyo5XJzXP5AgV0EkVU9UeLKZ3hRZoD84AQ9I+boJl9pBWkpm 1Y3v76u31JL5fwPh6hyN19teKp3TDnt0kL+0qk7edFHbrU8r8ZFMRpeZVyn2ZnkrAD5+ UqLtLCUXfXX/jkKKoXtM9OCJTNZUwjoiY8dhY19fBIPzZIOfjo3Ak0akSBUg2N+ZSeex rgqwUFfGveJf4Ly1JcB+RsNIX9lbOrV7qyk7zKWsKp888Nt8MEU+fwDwkphTxI/2mPQO 9TrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:to:from; bh=ZtvlLxJWPBxi+eADXuoy6i3toYcza99uTqmUDH2AVFg=; b=hOIChNpeyhIBd6dWBH1WFxNwpRSpPpMZSSJhxudEjXd7UeTBy4Fvln+X5ofcnnt0H4 w708+Pz+QUDLx1TpKmvPTFqwNaJvRcCaASDhVpGwCfsNjGgE3YEalgYIRcbnLuwnW0f4 jTt5Y42s30icJH6MJ5IfJffJSxo8D5KjWpZclnB3oGXI02Ct97e5+/JMffY/htUZMpKq Sof38A7xKUCv87Vy51Tn7wVDrseQ4+XiqJT/6VqFn8WRCOx8ko0qkWEv622QtFL4GnCd EavXPgw/iCzOjndu9H3Ns1o8FdIzj/b1zliwXhGt82LwIbQcZhTvtaAIoRQlfY+Atg8D SQJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g10-20020a1709067c4a00b0077ef3eece57si2453217ejp.144.2022.11.03.18.30.46; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 18:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229750AbiKDBWc (ORCPT <rfc822;jimliu8233@gmail.com> + 99 others); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 21:22:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32848 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229461AbiKDBW3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 21:22:29 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC5C95B7; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500015.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4N3NC20H5tzHvc3; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 09:22:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.101.6) by kwepemi500015.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 09:22:25 +0800 From: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> To: <edumazet@google.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, <dsahern@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <xemul@parallels.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [patch net v5] tcp: prohibit TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS if data was already sent Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:27:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20221104022723.1066429-1-luwei32@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.101.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemi500015.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.92) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1748527186406636538?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1748527186406636538?= |
Series |
[net,v5] tcp: prohibit TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS if data was already sent
|
|
Commit Message
Lu Wei
Nov. 4, 2022, 2:27 a.m. UTC
If setsockopt with option name of TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS and opt_code
of TCPOPT_SACK_PERM is called to enable sack after data is sent
and dupacks are received , it will trigger a warning in function
tcp_verify_left_out() as follows:
============================================
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2132
tcp_timeout_mark_lost+0x154/0x160
tcp_enter_loss+0x2b/0x290
tcp_retransmit_timer+0x50b/0x640
tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1c8/0x340
tcp_write_timer+0xe5/0x140
call_timer_fn+0x3a/0x1b0
__run_timers.part.0+0x1bf/0x2d0
run_timer_softirq+0x43/0xb0
__do_softirq+0xfd/0x373
__irq_exit_rcu+0xf6/0x140
The warning is caused in the following steps:
1. a socket named socketA is created
2. socketA enters repair mode without build a connection
3. socketA calls connect() and its state is changed to TCP_ESTABLISHED
directly
4. socketA leaves repair mode
5. socketA calls sendmsg() to send data, packets_out and sack_outs(dup
ack receives) increase
6. socketA enters repair mode again
7. socketA calls setsockopt with TCPOPT_SACK_PERM to enable sack
8. retransmit timer expires, it calls tcp_timeout_mark_lost(), lost_out
increases
9. sack_outs + lost_out > packets_out triggers since lost_out and
sack_outs increase repeatly
In function tcp_timeout_mark_lost(), tp->sacked_out will be cleared if
Step7 not happen and the warning will not be triggered. As suggested by
Denis and Eric, TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS should be prohibited if data was
already sent.
socket-tcp tests in CRIU has been tested as follows:
$ sudo ./test/zdtm.py run -t zdtm/static/socket-tcp* --keep-going \
--ignore-taint
socket-tcp* represent all socket-tcp tests in test/zdtm/static/.
Fixes: b139ba4e90dc ("tcp: Repair connection-time negotiated parameters")
Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
---
v5: modify the commit message
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 6:22 PM Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> wrote: > > If setsockopt with option name of TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS and opt_code > of TCPOPT_SACK_PERM is called to enable sack after data is sent > and dupacks are received , it will trigger a warning in function > tcp_verify_left_out() as follows: > > In function tcp_timeout_mark_lost(), tp->sacked_out will be cleared if > Step7 not happen and the warning will not be triggered. As suggested by > Denis and Eric, TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS should be prohibited if data was > already sent. > > socket-tcp tests in CRIU has been tested as follows: > $ sudo ./test/zdtm.py run -t zdtm/static/socket-tcp* --keep-going \ > --ignore-taint > > socket-tcp* represent all socket-tcp tests in test/zdtm/static/. > > Fixes: b139ba4e90dc ("tcp: Repair connection-time negotiated parameters") > Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> > --- > v5: modify the commit message > net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c > index ef14efa1fb70..54836a6b81d6 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c > @@ -3647,7 +3647,7 @@ int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, > case TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS: > if (!tp->repair) > err = -EINVAL; > - else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) > + else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED && !tp->bytes_sent) > err = tcp_repair_options_est(sk, optval, optlen); > else > err = -EPERM; > -- > 2.31.1 > SGTM, thanks. Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master) by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>: On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:27:23 +0800 you wrote: > If setsockopt with option name of TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS and opt_code > of TCPOPT_SACK_PERM is called to enable sack after data is sent > and dupacks are received , it will trigger a warning in function > tcp_verify_left_out() as follows: > > ============================================ > WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2132 > tcp_timeout_mark_lost+0x154/0x160 > tcp_enter_loss+0x2b/0x290 > tcp_retransmit_timer+0x50b/0x640 > tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1c8/0x340 > tcp_write_timer+0xe5/0x140 > call_timer_fn+0x3a/0x1b0 > __run_timers.part.0+0x1bf/0x2d0 > run_timer_softirq+0x43/0xb0 > __do_softirq+0xfd/0x373 > __irq_exit_rcu+0xf6/0x140 > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,v5] tcp: prohibit TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS if data was already sent https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/0c175da7b037 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c index ef14efa1fb70..54836a6b81d6 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c @@ -3647,7 +3647,7 @@ int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, case TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS: if (!tp->repair) err = -EINVAL; - else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) + else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED && !tp->bytes_sent) err = tcp_repair_options_est(sk, optval, optlen); else err = -EPERM;