[bpf-next,1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
Commit Message
We currently provide bpf_cpumask_first(), bpf_cpumask_any(), and
bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs. bpf_cpumask_any() and
bpf_cpumask_any_and() are confusing misnomers in that they actually just
call cpumask_first() and cpumask_first_and() respectively.
We'll replace them with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and
bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and() kfuncs in a subsequent patch, so let's
ensure feature parity by adding a bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc to
account for bpf_cpumask_any_and() being removed.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
kernel/bpf/cpumask.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
Comments
On 6/9/23 8:50 PM, David Vernet wrote:
> We currently provide bpf_cpumask_first(), bpf_cpumask_any(), and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs. bpf_cpumask_any() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() are confusing misnomers in that they actually just
> call cpumask_first() and cpumask_first_and() respectively.
>
> We'll replace them with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and() kfuncs in a subsequent patch, so let's
> ensure feature parity by adding a bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc to
> account for bpf_cpumask_any_and() being removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 22:50:49 -0500 you wrote:
> We currently provide bpf_cpumask_first(), bpf_cpumask_any(), and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs. bpf_cpumask_any() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() are confusing misnomers in that they actually just
> call cpumask_first() and cpumask_first_and() respectively.
>
> We'll replace them with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and() kfuncs in a subsequent patch, so let's
> ensure feature parity by adding a bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc to
> account for bpf_cpumask_any_and() being removed.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5ba3a7a851e3
- [bpf-next,2/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for new bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/58476d8a24bd
- [bpf-next,3/5] bpf: Replace bpf_cpumask_any* with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute*
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f983be917332
- [bpf-next,4/5] selftests/bpf: Update bpf_cpumask_any* tests to use bpf_cpumask_any_distribute*
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5a73efc7d1b4
- [bpf-next,5/5] bpf/docs: Update documentation for new cpumask kfuncs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/25085b4e9251
You are awesome, thank you!
@@ -131,6 +131,21 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 bpf_cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
return cpumask_first_zero(cpumask);
}
+/**
+ * bpf_cpumask_first_and() - Return the index of the first nonzero bit from the
+ * AND of two cpumasks.
+ * @src1: The first cpumask.
+ * @src2: The second cpumask.
+ *
+ * Find the index of the first nonzero bit of the AND of two cpumasks.
+ * struct bpf_cpumask pointers may be safely passed to @src1 and @src2.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc u32 bpf_cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *src1,
+ const struct cpumask *src2)
+{
+ return cpumask_first_and(src1, src2);
+}
+
/**
* bpf_cpumask_set_cpu() - Set a bit for a CPU in a BPF cpumask.
* @cpu: The CPU to be set in the cpumask.
@@ -406,6 +421,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_release, KF_RELEASE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_first, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_first_zero, KF_RCU)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_first_and, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_set_cpu, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_clear_cpu, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_test_cpu, KF_RCU)