rtc: stm32: remove dedicated wakeup management
Commit Message
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
There is no more needs to use a dedicated wake up interrupt for RTC as
EXTI block manages by itself now all interrupt lines.
Dedicated wakeup interrupt has been introduced with STM32 MP1 support
commit b72252b6580c ("rtc: stm32: add stm32mp1 rtc support") because GIC &
EXTI interrupts were not yet linked in EXTI driver.
Removing this interrupt won't break compatibility with device trees which
do use two interrupts entries: it could only prevent wakeup from low power
modes on STM32MP1x, but platform power management is not yet available.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 28 +++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, 31 May 2023 14:27:31 +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> There is no more needs to use a dedicated wake up interrupt for RTC as
> EXTI block manages by itself now all interrupt lines.
>
> Dedicated wakeup interrupt has been introduced with STM32 MP1 support
> commit b72252b6580c ("rtc: stm32: add stm32mp1 rtc support") because GIC &
> EXTI interrupts were not yet linked in EXTI driver.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] rtc: stm32: remove dedicated wakeup management
commit: 38e0689b27f8b9a0085815b2446b12f685d028aa
Best regards,
@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ struct stm32_rtc_data {
void (*clear_events)(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, unsigned int flags);
bool has_pclk;
bool need_dbp;
- bool has_wakeirq;
};
struct stm32_rtc {
@@ -127,7 +126,6 @@ struct stm32_rtc {
struct clk *rtc_ck;
const struct stm32_rtc_data *data;
int irq_alarm;
- int wakeirq_alarm;
};
static void stm32_rtc_wpr_unlock(struct stm32_rtc *rtc)
@@ -547,7 +545,6 @@ static void stm32_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
.has_pclk = false,
.need_dbp = true,
- .has_wakeirq = false,
.regs = {
.tr = 0x00,
.dr = 0x04,
@@ -569,7 +566,6 @@ static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32h7_rtc_data = {
.has_pclk = true,
.need_dbp = true,
- .has_wakeirq = false,
.regs = {
.tr = 0x00,
.dr = 0x04,
@@ -600,7 +596,6 @@ static void stm32mp1_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32mp1_data = {
.has_pclk = true,
.need_dbp = false,
- .has_wakeirq = true,
.regs = {
.tr = 0x00,
.dr = 0x04,
@@ -779,19 +774,12 @@ static int stm32_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
ret = device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
- if (rtc->data->has_wakeirq) {
- rtc->wakeirq_alarm = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
- if (rtc->wakeirq_alarm > 0) {
- ret = dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(&pdev->dev,
- rtc->wakeirq_alarm);
- } else {
- ret = rtc->wakeirq_alarm;
- if (rtc->wakeirq_alarm == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- goto err;
- }
- }
if (ret)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "alarm can't wake up the system: %d", ret);
+ goto err;
+
+ ret = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq_alarm);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
@@ -879,9 +867,6 @@ static int stm32_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
if (rtc->data->has_pclk)
clk_disable_unprepare(rtc->pclk);
- if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
- return enable_irq_wake(rtc->irq_alarm);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -903,9 +888,6 @@ static int stm32_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
- if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
- return disable_irq_wake(rtc->irq_alarm);
-
return ret;
}
#endif