diff mbox series

[next] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Replace fake flex-arrays with flexible-array members

Message ID ZHO4/Z+iO+lqV4rW@work
State New
Headers
Series [next] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Replace fake flex-arrays with flexible-array members |

Commit Message

Gustavo A. R. Silva May 28, 2023, 8:26 p.m. UTC 
  Zero-length and one-element arrays are deprecated, and we are moving
towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead.

Use the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro to transform zero-length
arrays in a union into flexible-array members. And replace a one-element
array with a C99 flexible-array member.

Address the following warnings found with GCC-13 and
-fstrict-flex-arrays=3 enabled:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1009:89: warning: array subscript kk is outside array bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1007:94: warning: array subscript kk is outside array bounds of ‘uint64_t[0]’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1310:94: warning: array subscript k is outside array bounds of ‘uint64_t[0]’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1309:57: warning: array subscript k is outside array bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]

This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [1].

This results in no differences in binary output.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/300
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [1]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/discovery.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Kees Cook May 30, 2023, 11:08 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 02:26:37PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Zero-length and one-element arrays are deprecated, and we are moving
> towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead.
> 
> Use the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro to transform zero-length
> arrays in a union into flexible-array members. And replace a one-element
> array with a C99 flexible-array member.
> 
> Address the following warnings found with GCC-13 and
> -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 enabled:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1009:89: warning: array subscript kk is outside array bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1007:94: warning: array subscript kk is outside array bounds of ‘uint64_t[0]’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1310:94: warning: array subscript k is outside array bounds of ‘uint64_t[0]’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1309:57: warning: array subscript k is outside array bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> 
> This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
> enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [1].
> 
> This results in no differences in binary output.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/300
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [1]
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Alex Deucher June 2, 2023, 6:27 p.m. UTC | #2 
Applied.  Thanks!

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 7:08 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 02:26:37PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Zero-length and one-element arrays are deprecated, and we are moving
> > towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead.
> >
> > Use the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro to transform zero-length
> > arrays in a union into flexible-array members. And replace a one-element
> > array with a C99 flexible-array member.
> >
> > Address the following warnings found with GCC-13 and
> > -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 enabled:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1009:89: warning: array subscript kk is outside array bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1007:94: warning: array subscript kk is outside array bounds of ‘uint64_t[0]’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1310:94: warning: array subscript k is outside array bounds of ‘uint64_t[0]’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1309:57: warning: array subscript k is outside array bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Warray-bounds=]
> >
> > This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
> > enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [1].
> >
> > This results in no differences in binary output.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/300
> > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/discovery.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/discovery.h
index 9181e57887db..f43e29722ef7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/discovery.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/discovery.h
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@  typedef struct ip_v3
 	uint8_t sub_revision : 4;               /* HCID Sub-Revision */
 	uint8_t variant : 4;                    /* HW variant */
 #endif
-	uint32_t base_address[1];               /* Base Address list. Corresponds to the num_base_address field*/
+	uint32_t base_address[];		/* Base Address list. Corresponds to the num_base_address field*/
 } ip_v3;
 
 typedef struct ip_v4 {
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@  typedef struct ip_v4 {
 	uint8_t sub_revision : 4;               /* HCID Sub-Revision */
 #endif
 	union {
-		uint32_t base_address[0];               /* 32-bit Base Address list. Corresponds to the num_base_address field*/
-		uint64_t base_address_64[0];            /* 64-bit Base Address list. Corresponds to the num_base_address field*/
+		DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(uint32_t, base_address);	/* 32-bit Base Address list. Corresponds to the num_base_address field*/
+		DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(uint64_t, base_address_64);	/* 64-bit Base Address list. Corresponds to the num_base_address field*/
 	} __packed;
 } ip_v4;