sched: deadline: Simplify pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task()
Commit Message
Using the while statement instead of the if and goto statements is more
concise and efficient.
Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
On 5/30/2023 11:41 PM, Li kunyu wrote:
> Using the while statement instead of the if and goto statements is more
> concise and efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
LGTM, Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
-- Mukesh
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index d823e608c7f0..b94a498f8cd9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2112,15 +2112,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
>
> next_node = rb_first_cached(&rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_root);
>
> -next_node:
> - if (next_node) {
> + while (next_node) {
> p = __node_2_pdl(next_node);
>
> if (pick_dl_task(rq, p, cpu))
> return p;
>
> next_node = rb_next(next_node);
> - goto next_node;
> }
>
> return NULL;
@@ -2112,15 +2112,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
next_node = rb_first_cached(&rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_root);
-next_node:
- if (next_node) {
+ while (next_node) {
p = __node_2_pdl(next_node);
if (pick_dl_task(rq, p, cpu))
return p;
next_node = rb_next(next_node);
- goto next_node;
}
return NULL;