diff mbox series

[2/3] media: s5p-mfc:Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250 SOC

Message ID 20221102130602.48969-2-aakarsh.jain@samsung.com
State New
Headers
Series [1/3] arm64: exynos: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC. |

Commit Message

Aakarsh Jain Nov. 2, 2022, 1:06 p.m. UTC 
  commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string as used by
Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
IP clock.
Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
"samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.

Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Fixes: 5441e9dafdfc ("[media] s5p-mfc: Core support for MFC v7")
Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
---
 .../media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Tommaso Merciai Nov. 3, 2022, 10:54 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Aakarsh,

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:36:01PM +0530, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
> Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string as used by
> Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
> IP clock.
> Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
> "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.
> 
> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Fixes: 5441e9dafdfc ("[media] s5p-mfc: Core support for MFC v7")
> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> index fca5c6405eec..007c7dbee037 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> @@ -1576,8 +1576,18 @@ static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7 = {
>  	.port_num	= MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
>  	.buf_size	= &buf_size_v7,
>  	.fw_name[0]     = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
> -	.clk_names	= {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
> -	.num_clocks	= 2,
> +	.clk_names	= {"mfc"},
> +	.num_clocks	= 1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7_3250 = {
> +	.version        = MFC_VERSION_V7,
> +	.version_bit    = MFC_V7_BIT,
> +	.port_num       = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
> +	.buf_size       = &buf_size_v7,
> +	.fw_name[0]     = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
> +	.clk_names      = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
> +	.num_clocks     = 2,
>  };
>  
>  static struct s5p_mfc_buf_size_v6 mfc_buf_size_v8 = {
> @@ -1647,6 +1657,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_mfc_match[] = {
>  	}, {
>  		.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7",
>  		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7,
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc",
> +		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7_3250,
>  	}, {
>  		.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v8",
>  		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v8,
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Patch looks good to me, only one fix in commit body:

"... Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string..."

with:

"... Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string...

But this is a nitpicking :)

Regards,
Tommaso
Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 3, 2022, 12:35 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 02/11/2022 09:06, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for

Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.

> Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string as used by
> Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
> IP clock.
> Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
> "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.

Aren't you just missing the clock on Exynos3250?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Marek Szyprowski Nov. 3, 2022, 12:44 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 03.11.2022 13:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/11/2022 09:06, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
>> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.
>
>> Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string as used by
>> Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
>> IP clock.
>> Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
>> "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.
> Aren't you just missing the clock on Exynos3250?

Nope, the Exynos3250 variant indeed has only one clock and the driver 
code simply ignored the -ENOENT error while getting the clocks, see the 
code in drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_pm.c, so it 
worked fine even without it.

IMHO it is a good idea to clean this up.

Best regards
Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 3, 2022, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #4 
On 03/11/2022 08:44, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 03.11.2022 13:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/11/2022 09:06, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
>>> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.
>>
>>> Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string as used by
>>> Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of
>>> IP clock.
>>> Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
>>> "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.
>> Aren't you just missing the clock on Exynos3250?
> 
> Nope, the Exynos3250 variant indeed has only one clock and the driver 
> code simply ignored the -ENOENT error while getting the clocks, see the 
> code in drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_pm.c, so it 
> worked fine even without it.
> 
> IMHO it is a good idea to clean this up.

OK, then please make the new compatible followed by old.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Aakarsh Jain Nov. 9, 2022, 4:02 a.m. UTC | #5 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org]
> Sent: 03 November 2022 18:16
> To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>; Aakarsh Jain
> <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> media@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: andrzej.hajda@intel.com; mchehab@kernel.org; hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl;
> ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@gmail.com;
> benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org; dillon.minfei@gmail.com;
> david.plowman@raspberrypi.com; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; andi@etezian.org;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; aswani.reddy@samsung.com;
> pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; smitha.t@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: s5p-mfc:Add variant data for MFC v7
> hardware for Exynos 3250 SOC
> 
> On 03/11/2022 08:44, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 03.11.2022 13:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 02/11/2022 09:06, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> >>> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
> >> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.
> >>
As I didn't see any checkpatch warnings from the above commit message.
Anyway I fixed all checkpatch warnings from drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c and posted 3 patches for the same.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20221109035348.69026-1-aakarsh.jain@samsung.com/

> >>> Exynos3250 and used the same compatible string as used by
> >>> Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of IP
> >>> clock.
> >>> Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
> >>> "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC.
> >> Aren't you just missing the clock on Exynos3250?
> >
> > Nope, the Exynos3250 variant indeed has only one clock and the driver
> > code simply ignored the -ENOENT error while getting the clocks, see
> > the code in drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_pm.c, so it
> > worked fine even without it.
> >
> > IMHO it is a good idea to clean this up.
> 
> OK, then please make the new compatible followed by old.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Thanks for the review.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
index fca5c6405eec..007c7dbee037 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
@@ -1576,8 +1576,18 @@  static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7 = {
 	.port_num	= MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
 	.buf_size	= &buf_size_v7,
 	.fw_name[0]     = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
-	.clk_names	= {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
-	.num_clocks	= 2,
+	.clk_names	= {"mfc"},
+	.num_clocks	= 1,
+};
+
+static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7_3250 = {
+	.version        = MFC_VERSION_V7,
+	.version_bit    = MFC_V7_BIT,
+	.port_num       = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
+	.buf_size       = &buf_size_v7,
+	.fw_name[0]     = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
+	.clk_names      = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
+	.num_clocks     = 2,
 };
 
 static struct s5p_mfc_buf_size_v6 mfc_buf_size_v8 = {
@@ -1647,6 +1657,9 @@  static const struct of_device_id exynos_mfc_match[] = {
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7",
 		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7,
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc",
+		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7_3250,
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v8",
 		.data = &mfc_drvdata_v8,