[2/2] selftests/kvm: Allow dump per-vcpu info for uffd threads

Message ID 20230427201112.2164776-3-peterx@redhat.com
State New
Headers
Series selftests/kvm: Fixes for demand paging test |

Commit Message

Peter Xu April 27, 2023, 8:11 p.m. UTC
  There's one PER_VCPU_DEBUG in per-vcpu uffd threads but it's never hit.

Trigger that when quit in normal ways (kick pollfd[1]), meanwhile fix the
number of nanosec calculation.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

James Houghton April 27, 2023, 8:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:11 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> There's one PER_VCPU_DEBUG in per-vcpu uffd threads but it's never hit.
>
> Trigger that when quit in normal ways (kick pollfd[1]), meanwhile fix the
> number of nanosec calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
> index 92cef20902f1..271f63891581 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
>                         r = read(pollfd[1].fd, &tmp_chr, 1);
>                         TEST_ASSERT(r == 1,
>                                     "Error reading pipefd in UFFD thread\n");
> -                       return NULL;
> +                       break;
>                 }
>
>                 if (!(pollfd[0].revents & POLLIN))
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
>         ts_diff = timespec_elapsed(start);
>         PER_VCPU_DEBUG("userfaulted %ld pages over %ld.%.9lds. (%f/sec)\n",
>                        pages, ts_diff.tv_sec, ts_diff.tv_nsec,
> -                      pages / ((double)ts_diff.tv_sec + (double)ts_diff.tv_nsec / 100000000.0));
> +                      pages / ((double)ts_diff.tv_sec + (double)ts_diff.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_SEC));

I almost confused this fix for [1]. Thanks for catching this!

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230223001805.2971237-1-amoorthy@google.com/

>
>         return NULL;
>  }
> --
> 2.39.1
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
index 92cef20902f1..271f63891581 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@  static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
 			r = read(pollfd[1].fd, &tmp_chr, 1);
 			TEST_ASSERT(r == 1,
 				    "Error reading pipefd in UFFD thread\n");
-			return NULL;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		if (!(pollfd[0].revents & POLLIN))
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@  static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
 	ts_diff = timespec_elapsed(start);
 	PER_VCPU_DEBUG("userfaulted %ld pages over %ld.%.9lds. (%f/sec)\n",
 		       pages, ts_diff.tv_sec, ts_diff.tv_nsec,
-		       pages / ((double)ts_diff.tv_sec + (double)ts_diff.tv_nsec / 100000000.0));
+		       pages / ((double)ts_diff.tv_sec + (double)ts_diff.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_SEC));
 
 	return NULL;
 }