net: Finish up ->msg_control{,_user} split
Commit Message
Commit 1f466e1f15cf ("net: cleanly handle kernel vs user buffers for
->msg_control") introduced the msg_control_user and
msg_control_is_user fields in struct msghdr to ensure user pointers
are represented as such. It also took care of converting most users
of struct msghdr::msg_control where user pointers are involved. It
did however miss a number of cases, and some code using msg_control
inappropriately has also appeared in the meantime.
This patch is attempting to complete the split. Most issues are about
msg_control being used when in fact a user pointer is stored in the
union; msg_control_user is now used instead. An exception is made
for null checks, as it should be safe to use msg_control
unconditionally for that purpose.
Additionally, a special situation in
cmsghdr_from_user_compat_to_kern() is addressed. There the input
struct msghdr holds a user pointer (msg_control_user), but a kernel
pointer is stored in msg_control when returning. msg_control_is_user
is now updated accordingly.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
---
Note: this issue was discovered during the porting of Linux on
Morello [1].
[1] https://git.morello-project.org/morello/kernel/linux
net/compat.c | 13 +++++++------
net/core/scm.c | 9 ++++++---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Comments
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 01:26:25PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> This patch is attempting to complete the split. Most issues are about
> msg_control being used when in fact a user pointer is stored in the
> union; msg_control_user is now used instead. An exception is made
> for null checks, as it should be safe to use msg_control
> unconditionally for that purpose.
So all of the fixes looks good to me.
> Additionally, a special situation in
> cmsghdr_from_user_compat_to_kern() is addressed. There the input
> struct msghdr holds a user pointer (msg_control_user), but a kernel
> pointer is stored in msg_control when returning. msg_control_is_user
> is now updated accordingly.
But this is a small isolated real bugfix. So I'd suggest to split
this into a simple and easily backportable patch, and do the rest
in another.
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> index 2917dd8d198c..ae818ff46224 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> @@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> goto done;
>
> msg.msg_controllen = optlen;
> + msg.msg_control_is_user = false;
And this is another one that has a real effect.
On 12/04/2023 17:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 01:26:25PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> This patch is attempting to complete the split. Most issues are about
>> msg_control being used when in fact a user pointer is stored in the
>> union; msg_control_user is now used instead. An exception is made
>> for null checks, as it should be safe to use msg_control
>> unconditionally for that purpose.
> So all of the fixes looks good to me.
>
>> Additionally, a special situation in
>> cmsghdr_from_user_compat_to_kern() is addressed. There the input
>> struct msghdr holds a user pointer (msg_control_user), but a kernel
>> pointer is stored in msg_control when returning. msg_control_is_user
>> is now updated accordingly.
> But this is a small isolated real bugfix. So I'd suggest to split
> this into a simple and easily backportable patch, and do the rest
> in another.
>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
>> index 2917dd8d198c..ae818ff46224 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
>> @@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
>> goto done;
>>
>> msg.msg_controllen = optlen;
>> + msg.msg_control_is_user = false;
> And this is another one that has a real effect.
Thank you, both good points! Will split that up into a series of three
patches.
Kevin
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ int get_compat_msghdr(struct msghdr *kmsg,
#define CMSG_COMPAT_FIRSTHDR(msg) \
(((msg)->msg_controllen) >= sizeof(struct compat_cmsghdr) ? \
- (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)((msg)->msg_control) : \
+ (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)((msg)->msg_control_user) : \
(struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)NULL)
#define CMSG_COMPAT_OK(ucmlen, ucmsg, mhdr) \
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static inline struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cmsg_compat_nxthdr(struct msghdr *ms
struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cmsg, int cmsg_len)
{
char __user *ptr = (char __user *)cmsg + CMSG_COMPAT_ALIGN(cmsg_len);
- if ((unsigned long)(ptr + 1 - (char __user *)msg->msg_control) >
+ if ((unsigned long)(ptr + 1 - (char __user *)msg->msg_control_user) >
msg->msg_controllen)
return NULL;
return (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)ptr;
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ int cmsghdr_from_user_compat_to_kern(struct msghdr *kmsg, struct sock *sk,
goto Einval;
/* Ok, looks like we made it. Hook it up and return success. */
+ kmsg->msg_control_is_user = false;
kmsg->msg_control = kcmsg_base;
kmsg->msg_controllen = kcmlen;
return 0;
@@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ int cmsghdr_from_user_compat_to_kern(struct msghdr *kmsg, struct sock *sk,
int put_cmsg_compat(struct msghdr *kmsg, int level, int type, int len, void *data)
{
- struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cm = (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *) kmsg->msg_control;
+ struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cm = (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *) kmsg->msg_control_user;
struct compat_cmsghdr cmhdr;
struct old_timeval32 ctv;
struct old_timespec32 cts[3];
@@ -274,7 +275,7 @@ int put_cmsg_compat(struct msghdr *kmsg, int level, int type, int len, void *dat
cmlen = CMSG_COMPAT_SPACE(len);
if (kmsg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
cmlen = kmsg->msg_controllen;
- kmsg->msg_control += cmlen;
+ kmsg->msg_control_user += cmlen;
kmsg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
return 0;
}
@@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ static int scm_max_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg)
void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
{
struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cm =
- (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control;
+ (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control_user;
unsigned int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds_compat(msg), scm->fp->count);
int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_COMPAT_DATA(cm);
@@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
cmlen = CMSG_COMPAT_SPACE(i * sizeof(int));
if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
- msg->msg_control += cmlen;
+ msg->msg_control_user += cmlen;
msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
}
}
@@ -250,7 +250,10 @@ int put_cmsg(struct msghdr * msg, int level, int type, int len, void *data)
}
cmlen = min(CMSG_SPACE(len), msg->msg_controllen);
- msg->msg_control += cmlen;
+ if (msg->msg_control_is_user)
+ msg->msg_control_user += cmlen;
+ else
+ msg->msg_control += cmlen;
msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
return 0;
@@ -299,7 +302,7 @@ static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
{
struct cmsghdr __user *cm =
- (__force struct cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control;
+ (__force struct cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control_user;
unsigned int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
@@ -332,7 +335,7 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i * sizeof(int));
if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
- msg->msg_control += cmlen;
+ msg->msg_control_user += cmlen;
msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
}
}
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static void tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp(struct sock *sk,
struct msghdr cmsg_dummy;
msg_control_addr = (unsigned long)zc->msg_control;
- cmsg_dummy.msg_control = (void *)msg_control_addr;
+ cmsg_dummy.msg_control_user = (void __user *)msg_control_addr;
cmsg_dummy.msg_controllen =
(__kernel_size_t)zc->msg_controllen;
cmsg_dummy.msg_flags = in_compat_syscall()
@@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@ static void tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp(struct sock *sk,
zc->msg_controllen == cmsg_dummy.msg_controllen) {
tcp_recv_timestamp(&cmsg_dummy, sk, tss);
zc->msg_control = (__u64)
- ((uintptr_t)cmsg_dummy.msg_control);
+ ((uintptr_t)cmsg_dummy.msg_control_user);
zc->msg_controllen =
(__u64)cmsg_dummy.msg_controllen;
zc->msg_flags = (__u32)cmsg_dummy.msg_flags;
@@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
goto done;
msg.msg_controllen = optlen;
+ msg.msg_control_is_user = false;
msg.msg_control = (void *)(opt+1);
ipc6.opt = opt;